Republicans not extreme enough!!!
In response to David Brooks' mournful New York Times column about extremists in the Republican Party, I can only respond thusly: Unfortunately, there are NO extremists in the Republican Party and I must continue my search for public leaders who will sponsor the following measures: The restoration of racial segregation Ejection of all immigrants, legal as well as illegal, since 1965 Restriction of the franchise to white heterosexual males above age 40 End of affirmative action Confiscatory taxation of incomes over $250,000/year Withdrawal from all overseas military installations Refund of monies sent to Israel Withdrawal from the United Nations End of welfare Restoration of military draft Derecognition of France Formation of a Confederation of the Northern Hemisphere with a 90% Caucasian demographic Prison for TV and Hollywood producers Capital punishment for bankers Stealth planes to be remanded to the Rio Grande New York Times editors to be aportioned to traveling circus owners ....... and so much more! http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/30/opinion/brooks-a-moderate-conservative-dilemma.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rssLabels: conservatism, David Brooks, extremism, New York Times, Republican Party
Florida's New & Improved Voting Regulations
In a New York Times article on March 27, 2012, Michael Cooper and Jo Craven McGinty bemoan the new changes to Florida's voting regulations. They claim that these restrictions for some reason especially hinder minorities and Democrats from exercising their right to vote. Better if far fewer were allowed to vote, especially those who are not genetically capable of wise decision making. Dictatorships are generally superior to mass democracies like the present-day United States where all races and genders are encouraged to help decide American policy. If the franchise had followed the Athenian example, only males of a certain age and position would be allowed to vote, and we would not now be crippled by unlimited immigration, affirmative action, racial integration, impossible federal debt, welfare, useless schools employing illiterate "teachers," political correctness, Afropromotionism/Anglodemotionism, and all the other self-inflicted ills that are turning our once-beautiful country into a dumpting ground for ethnic sewage. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/28/us/restrictions-on-voter-registration-in-florida-have-groups-opting-out.html?_r=1&ref=politicsLabels: Florida voting law, restrictions on voting
The Color of the Country
March 26, 2012, New York Times: The Renegade Republicans, by THOMAS B. EDSALL "...the color of this country will be quite different and much better soon."Strange thing to say. Of the world's some 200 sovereign countries, only about a score of them are prosperous and well-governed, and all of those have hefty white majorities. In fact, the minoritization of Caucasians in America will necessarily coincide with a reduction of this country's ranking to the status of, say, The Democratic Republic of the Congo, or if we are very lucky, Somalia. You do realize that the glory period of American history, when we led the world in everything, was accomplished with a demographic that was 90% white. The notion that the same sort of advancement can emerge from a multi-racial dispensation is not only rejected by large majorities here, but ignores the awful consequences visited upon every other society that has ever attempted any such thing. I speak, of course, of the love affair between: Europeans and Indians Russians and Poles Germans and Jews Czechs and Slovaks Latvians and Russians English and Irish Serbs and Croats Christians and Muslims Moors and Spaniards Neanderthals and true Humans Corsicans and French Goths and Romans Jews and Jebusites Australians and Australasians Incas and Spaniards Chinese and Vietnamese Romans and Picts Persians and Greeks Arabs and http://http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/the-renegade-republicans/?hpLabels: demographics of U.S., race
'Year of the Woman' fades -- HOT DOG!!!!
In an article in yesterday's Washington Post , Karen Tumulty reports on those women lamenting the failure of the 1992 women's push to move into the Washington arena. "...a growing body of evidence suggests that these pathbreaking women [in politics] have proved to be cautionary examples - not role models..." It is encouraging to find that women have at last begun to understand that they have no authentic right to participate in important decision making in either politics, business, or the arts.The male is the primary gender and women are but stolen rib bones in expensive clothes. The sole obligation of a woman is to identify that man to whom she wishes to consecrate her life, and then to adore and serve him for the balance of her days. That women are today being thrust into positions for which they are genetically ineligible is simply one more marker of the radical decadence of these times. Happiness for women lies only in the arms of a man, and if you doubt that, I recommend that the next time you find yourself on the streets of New York City (or any other similar Gehenna), that you take a glance into the faces of career women striding forward militantly on six-inch heels. http://http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/twenty-years-on-year-of-the-woman-fades/2012/03/21/gIQA41UUYS_story.html?hpid=z2Labels: feminism, gender wars, women in politics
Who Should Serve in the Military?
Xenophobia in Alabama?
March 22, 2012, 4:41PM I have always considered myself highly flattered when denominated a "xenophobe." And so you can easily imagine my chagrin upon learning that the word refers merely to the fear of foreigners rather than to the loathing that continues as one of my favorite personal virtues. All I ask is to be given absolute authority for a period of one year, at the end of which time Alabama will be whiter than vanilla frosting http://annistonstar.com/view/full_story/17735894/article-Immigrants-could-take-up-slack-for-aging-Alabama? http://blog.al.com/jkennedy/2012/03/joey_kennedy_this_story_is_sur.html Labels: Alabama, immigration, xenophobia
Racism - is it really evil?
Don't understand why racism is considered an evil. In my view, we need a powerful resurgence of racism to avert global homogenization of populations, and the consequent loss of the particularistic virtues that are race specific. I can remember when the U.S.was 90% Caucasian and enjoyed a general moral consensus that provided a much lower level of criminality, educational failure, illegal drug use, bastardy, welfare dependency, immigration, and cultural degradation. On a ten-scale, America was an "8" in those days, but now is in sub-zero territory, most of it due to the infusion of people who come here to parasitize the sort of economy they have been unable to construct in their own countries. It represents perhaps the stangest and most unnecessary tragedy in human history - a once-successful society gleefully destroying itself in defense of the preposterous theory of universal equality. Labels: political correctness, racism
|